Main -> And dating -> Personality characteristics of a sample of violent adolescents against their partners

Personality characteristics of a sample of violent adolescents against their partners

Wendy Craig - Sexting: the issues and how to address them

We use cookies to offer you a better experience, personalize content, tailor advertising, provide social media features, and better understand the use of our services. Do you want to read the rest of this article? We use cookies to make interactions with our website easy and meaningful, to better understand the use of our services, and to tailor advertising. For further information, including about cookie settings, please read our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies.

Violence and Victims, 17— Hanby, M. Social anxiety as a predictor of dating aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27— Hird, M. Feminist Theory, 1 3— Hughes, F. Predicting the use of aggressive conflict tactics in a sample of women arrested for domestic violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24 2— Development of antisocial behavior in adolescent girls.

Kazemian Eds. Suiza: Springer.

Aggression in adolescent dating relationships prevalence justification and health consequences

Psicothema, 22 4— Luthra, R. Dating violence among college men and women: evaluation of a theoretical model. Ma, H. The relation of gender-role classifications to the prosocial and antisocial behavior of Chinese adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2— McKeown, A. Attachment, personality and female perpetrators of intimate partner violence.

McLaughlin, K. Developmental trajectories of anxiety and depression in early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43 2— Monson, C.

Sexual and nonsexual dating violence perpetration: Testing an integrated perpetrator typology. Moore, T.

Request PDF on ResearchGate | Aggression in Adolescent Dating Relationships: Prevalence, Justification, and Health Consequences | To assess the.

Alcohol use and intimate partner violence perpetration among college students: Assessing the temporal association using electronic diary technology. Psychology of Violence, 1— Morey, L. Personality assessment inventory PAI. Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources. Relationship between dating violence and use of alcohol and illegal drugs in Spanish adolescents and young adults. Psicothema, 21 2— Prevalence and predictors of sexual aggression in dating relationships of adolescents and young adults.

Psicothema, 21— Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40— O'Keefe, M. Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12— Ortega, R. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8 163— Pazos, M. Ramirez, C. Renner, L.

To study the prevalence of aggressive behaviors against the couple in a sample of Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health consequences. However, the psychological consequences (fear) are greater for girls. .. pediatricians, and other practitioners to focus on healthy relationships in both boys and Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and. Dating relationships can play a central part in facilitating healthy Prevalence estimates of adolescent dating abuse vary widely, . an adolescent-limited trajectory of interpersonal aggression (Reyes Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health consequences.

Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Rey-Anaconda, C. Malos tratos ejercidos por adolescentes durante el noviazgo: diferencias por sexo [Bad treatment by adolescents during courtship: differences by sex]. Rivera-Rivera, L. Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: Baseline study of a cohort of male and female Mexican public school students.

Preventive Medicine, 44 6— Rubio-Garay, F. Sears, H. The co-ocurrence of adolescent boys and girls use of psychologically, physically, and sexually abusive behaviours in their dating relationships.

Journal of Adolescence, 30 3— Sebastian, J. Jealousy and violence in dating relationships: gender-related differences among a Spanish sample. Spanish Journal of Psyhology Shook, N. Courtship violence among college students: A comparison of verbally and physically abusive couples. Journal of Family Violence, 151— Taylor, B.

A national descriptive portrait of adolescent relationship abuse: results from the National Survey on Teen Relationships and Intimate Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31 6— Vicario-Molina, I. Dating violence among youth couples: dyadic analysis of the prevalence and agreement.

The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18 e361— White, J. A gendered approach to adolescent dating violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 331— Wolfe, D. Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13 2— Predicting abuse in adolescent dating relationship over 1 year: the role of child maltreatment and trauma. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 3— All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Services on Demand Journal. The psychological, social and sexual modalities of violence took place with higher frequency, while the physical, objectal and sexual were better perceived.

The correlation between frequency and perception was very low in the younger sample, indicating that, at least in this group, the discrimination was not enough to avoid violent attitudes and behaviors. We concluded that it is necessary to work in detection, prevention and eradication of violent behavior in early stages, recognizing multiple cultural factors involved like myths and gender roles in domestic violence.

Relaciones Violentas en el Noviazgo: un estudio exploratorio. Expected consequences of male violence against their female dating partners. David S. Riggs M. We examined the expected consequences of male college students to their perpetration of physical violence against their female dating partners and the association of these expected consequences to the actual use of violence in the men's current dating relationships.

Specifically, violent men were significantly more likely than nonviolent men to expect that violence would result in their winning the argument, whereas nonviolent men were more likely than violent men to believe that the use of violence would result in an end to the relationship. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed. Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Vangie A Foshee. Studies of adults report inconsistent findings as to whether males or females are more likely to use violent behaviors toward their partner.

Although partner violence frequently begins during adolescence, few dating violence studies involve adolescents and even fewer report findings by gender. This study examines gender differences in adolescent dating violence. The significant find- ings are that 1 females perpetrate more mild, moderate and severe violence than males towards partners even when controlling for violence perpetrated in self-defense; 2 females perpetrate more violence than males out of self- defense; 3 males perpetrate more sexual dating violence than females; 4 males and females sustain equal amounts of mild, moderate and severe dating violence; 5 females sustain more sexual dating violence than males; 6 females sustain more psychological abuse than males from their partners; and 7 females receive more injuries than males from dating violence.

These findings suggest that adolescent dating violence prevention programs are warranted and that unlike most dating violence prevention programs, both males and females should be. Jacquelyn W. White Lex L. Merrill Mary P. Research on intimate partner IP aggression was extended to premilitary experiences of IP violence among U. Navy recruits. A test was conducted of the model using participant gender along with the significant variables from the initial analyses and the interaction of gender with each of these variables.

Situational components explained more variance that did the background components. For women and men, the amount of variance accounted for was almost tripled after the addition of the situational factors. Partner aggression contributed to a substantial increase in the amount of variance. Partner's verbal aggression was the single best predictor of aggression, and partner's physical aggression was the second-best predictor. The situational component substantially increased the predictive power of the model.

The results support the validity of the Riggs and O'Leary model. Numerous variables belonging to one of three domains were entered into hierarchical multiple regression analyses. Females were more likely to be violent toward a dating partner when they believed that female-to-male dating violence was justifiable and that male-to-female violence was not justifiable; experienced more conflict in the dating relationship; were the recipients of dating violence; used alcohol or drugs; and felt the relationship was more serious.

The context of the violence was also examined and the implications of the study were addressed. Aug Pers Soc Psychol Bull. Stephen S. This study examined frequency and severity of physical, symbolic, and psychological aggression between college men and women in 85 heterosexual dating relationships and the extent to which gender role constructs predicted reports of aggression.

Although there were no differences on self-reports of perpetration, men reported higher victimization levels than women and higher physical and psychological victimization levels than perpetration levels, whereas women reported higher symbolic perpetration levels than victimization levels.

As a result, averaging reports from both partners suggested that women in existing college dating relationships are more aggressive than men. For both genders, stereotypically negative masculine i. Murray A. Development of research on intrafamily conflict and violence requires both conceptual clarity and measures of the concepts.

The introduction to this paper therefore seeks to clarify and distinguish the concepts of "conflict," "conflict of interest," "hostility," and "violence. Information is presented on the following aspects of this instrument: theoretical rational, acceptability to respondents, scoring, factor structure, reliability, validity, and norms for a nationally representative sample of 2, couples. Although the original Conflict Tactics Scales CTS have been successfully used in many countries, no studies have been published on the cross-cultural reliability and validity of the revised instrument CTS2.

This study is intended to provide some of the needed psychometric information. It reports reliability and examples of validity evidence for the five CTS2 physical assault, physical injury, psychological aggression, sexual coercion, and negotiation to measure these aspects of the dating relationships of 7, students at 33 universities in 17 countries. The results show high alpha coefficients of internal consistency and low confounding with social desirability response set.

Although the data refer to dating relationships of university students, the results are sufficiently promising to encourage use of the CTS2 in a variety of cultural settings. Factor structure and convergent validity of the Conflict Tactics Scale in high school students. Smith Slep.

Straus, in a large multiethnic high school sample. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approaches were used. Results generally supported 2-factor models for males and females. A substantial proportion of residual variance remained after the 2 primary factors were extracted, and correlations among this residual variance suggested meaningful differences in the perpetration and experience of dating violence for males and females.

Furthermore, the factor structure for males' self-reported victimization suggested that items representing psychological and mild physical aggression, which loaded on 1 factor, may be perceived similarly.

Convergent validity analyses that examined the correlation among CTS traditional and factor scores with jealous actions, control tactics, and attitudes justifying males' and females' use of dating aggression provided initial support for the constructs identified. Results are discussed in terms of improving measurement of dating aggression. It's not all moonlight and roses: Dating violence at the University of Maine, Mar Coll Student J.

Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification and health consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, – Journal of Adolescent Health, 21(5), – Mapp, S. C. (). The effects of sexual abuse as a child on the risk of mothers physically Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health consequences. Epidemiology and consequences of women's revictimization. Women's Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health.

Cheri L. Flannery Mike Conlon. Compared surveys conducted in and at the University of Maine with regard to the types of dating violence reported and the overall current rates of dating violence. Gender differences in reporting specific types of violence were also compared.

The overall rate of dating violence has more than doubled since and suggests that 1 in 5 college students has experienced some form of dating violence within their more recent dating relationship. Explanations for the significant differences in reported rates by gender are suggested. Chad LeJeune Victoria M.

The questionnaire consisted of 3 sections: the 1st section requested demographic information; the 2nd section, completed only by Ss currently involved in a violent relationship, included questions about who usually initiates violent acts, who Ss consider to be at fault, and whether either partner is typically using alcohol or drugs when the violence occurs; and the 3rd section consisted of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Findings suggest that males were less likely than females to take responsibility for violence in a relationship and more likely to place blame on their partner.

Males were also more likely to indicate the use of alcohol or drugs during violent episodes. A Psychometric Evaluation of Interpartner Agreement. Terrie E. This study tested whether partners can be relied on to provide congruent reports about abuse in their relationship.

The authors examined whether interpartner agreement IA varies as a function of whether the perpetrator is the man or the woman, and by whether the abusive behavior being reported is physical or psychological.

Guided by psychometric test theory, the authors examined whether weak IA about specific behaviors can be improved by aggregating behavior items into scales and by controlling for random measurement error. A representative sample of young couples was studied.

IA did not vary with the perpetrator's gender or with the nature of the abusive behaviors, but victims both men and women reported somewhat more abuse than did their perpetrators.

IA about specific abusive behaviors was only poor to fair, but it became very good when items were aggregated into scales and even better when measurement errors were removed form the reports. The findings suggest that reports of abuse can be aggregated to form internally consistent scales that show strong IA, thereby fulfilling criteria for reliability.

Moreover, under research conditions that guarantee confidentiality, either abuser reports or victim reports are suitable methods for use in research on partner abuse. Prevalence and Predictors of Adolescent Dating Violence. Patricia Y. This study of rural North Carolina adolescents examined relationships among race, parental educational level, family structure, parental discipline, family violence exposure, and dating violence experiences. Dating violence experiences were assessed by a researcher-constructed instrument measuring warning signs of potential violence and actual violent experiences.

The results suggested that recognition of abusive relationships is difficult, with many adolescents denying such a relationship but actually reporting numerous abusive events. The study suggests new avenues for research in adolescent date violence, and for interventions with high risk groups. Intimate partner homicide: A review of the male proprietariness and the self-defense theories.

Serran Philip Firestone. In recent years, more attention has been focused on domestic violence. The focus of this article is on the most serious aspect of domestic violence, intimate partner homicide. Although both men and women kill their intimate partners, it appears that differences exist in the motivation behind the homicide in both cases.

The male proprietariness theory and the self-defense theory are presented as a means of understanding the gender differences in spousal homicide. These theories suggest that dynamics of the relationship play an important role in the increasing violence, which eventually results in homicide in certain instances. The implications of these theories are presented as a means of reducing the number of domestic homicides. Dating violence at three time periods:, and Data collected over the past 10 years were used to investigate whether there have been changes in the incidence of violence when dating reported at a large university.

Analyzes indicated that there has been a reduction in both verbal aggression and violence scores over the yr. In addition, the percentage of respondents who reported being in nonviolent relationships increased while the percentage of respondents in the three categories of relationship that include violence mutual, perpetrator, and victim decreased.

These findings indicate that there may be an over-all reduction in both verbal aggression and violence between dating partners as they attempt to resolve conflicts. Measuring emotional abuse in dating re-lationships as a multifactorial construct Psychological Abuse in Violent Relationships.

Murphy Cm Hoover Sa. Measuring emotional abuse in dating re-lationships as a multifactorial construct. Psychological Abuse in Violent Relationships. New York: Springer, ;29 — Prevalence and predictors of adolescent dating violence. This study describes partner violence in a representative sample of young adults. Physical violence perpetration was reported by Correlates of involvement in severe physical violence differed by gender.

Severe physical violence was more strongly associated with unemployment, low educational attainment, few social support resources, polydrug use, antisocial personality disorder symptoms, depression symptoms, and violence toward strangers for men than for women.

Women who were victims of severe physical violence were more likely than men who were victims to experience symptoms of anxiety. The findings converge with community studies showing that more women than men are physically violent toward a partner and with clinical studies highlighting violence perpetrated against women by men with deviant characteristics. Efficacy of dating violence prevention program on attitudes justifying aggression.

Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, Daniel O'Leary Annmarie Cano. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate a five-session dating violence prevention curriculum in terms of its effect on attitudes justifying the use of dating violence. The curriculum was implemented in all health classes in a Long Island, New York, school. A quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate change in attitudes justifying dating violence, with health classes randomly assigned to the treatment or no-treatment conditions.

Pre- to postprogram assessments indicated that there were significant decreases in overall attitudes justifying the use of dating violence as a means to resolve conflict among students exposed to the curriculum material, whereas those who were not exposed did not show attitude change from pre- to postprogram evaluation.

The curriculum shows promise as an effective tool for changing attitudes condoning dating violence.

%) and produced worse consequences for their female partners' health Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health. Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health consequences. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), – Murphy. Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health consequences. Munoz-Rivas MJ(1), Grana JL, O'Leary KD.

Future research is needed to determine whether the observed attitude change is also linked to reduction in aggressive behaviors. Shaista Malik Susan B. Sorenson Carol S. Adolescents are both the perpetrators and victims of violence in the United States. To reduce violence, it is important to identify those most at risk within particular contexts.

A social learning framework was used to investigate involvement in violence in a survey of high school students. Four outcomes community violence perpetration, community violence victimization, dating violence perpetration, and dating violence victimization were examined as a function of demographic characteristics, exposure to violence, and several potential mediating variables.

Exposure to weapons and violent injury in the community was the sole consistent predictor across the four outcomes. Gender generally was an important correlate of violence; there were substantial gender differences in the correlates of dating violence perpetration and victimization, but relatively few gender differences in the correlates of community violence involvement. Other demographic characteristics typically were of limited importance, and were largely accounted for by exposure to violence or other mediators.

Personal norms about the circumstances under which the use of violence is perceived as justified were important for three of the four outcome: community violence perpetration, and dating violence perpetration and victimization.

Being exposed to violence in one context appears to have crossover effects to victimization and perpetration in another context. Furthermore, victimization and perpetration often co-occur. Feb Violence Vict. Christopher M. Murphy Sharon A. Initial investigations of a multifactorial approach to the measurement of emotional abuse in dating relationships are presented.

An exploratory factor analysis on reports of partner behavior by female undergraduate students in dating relationships provided support for the hypothesized subscales.

Further evidence for discriminant and convergent validity was apparent in correlations with the circumplex scales of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, and with self-reported attachment variables.

The results support the assessment of emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Christine Wekerle David A. Adolescent dating violence is an important juncture in the developmental pathway to adult partnership violence.

As a window of opportunity for positive change, the present review considers the theoretical and empirical work on adolescent dating and dating violence.

A consideration of the scope of the problem, developmental processes, and theoretical formulations precede a review of six relationship violence prevention programs designed for and delivered to youth.

Five programs are school-based and one operates in the community. Prevention is targeted toward both universal e. Programs addressed specific skills and knowledge that oppose the use of violent and abusive behavior toward intimate partners; one program addressed interpersonal violence more generally, and was also included in this review because of its implications for dating violence initiatives.

Positive changes were found across studies in violence-related attitudes and knowledge, also, positive gains were noted in self-reported perpetration of dating violence, with less consistent evidence in self-reported victimization.

However, these findings should be considered preliminary due to limited follow-up and generalizability. Conceptual and methodological issues are discussed with a view toward improving assessment methods and research design. An Empirical study of adolescent dating aggression in the U. Myra J. The present study provides one of the first empirical investigations of adolescent dating aggression ADA in Britain.

The study found no significant association between religious affiliation, household composition, age, social class or the use of alcohol and ADA. The study also combined quantitative and qualitative methods to investigate the "symmetry of violence" theory, concluding that when the meaning and context of aggression are considered, male physical and sexual aggression is a significant problem in adolescent heterosexual relationships.

Diane R. Follingstad Rebekah Bradley James E. Laughlin Leslie K. When participants' scores were analyzed by dichotomizing them along the lines of ever versus never using dating violence, numerous past findings were replicated. However, participants using a higher frequency of force were distinguished by needing to control their partner and by less inhibition in expressing their anger. Implications for these findings were discussed. John Archer.

Meta-analyses of sex differences in physical aggression to heterosexual partners and in its physical consequences are reported.

The findings partially support previous claims that different methods of measurement produce conflicting results, but there was also evidence that the sample was an important moderator of effect size. Continuous models showed that younger aged dating samples and a lower proportion of physically aggressive males predicted effect sizes in the female direction.

Analyses were limited by the available database, which is biased toward young dating samples in the United States. Wider variations are discussed in terms of two conflicting norms about physical aggression to partners that operate to different degrees in different cultures. Dating violence: A critical review of the literature.

Sarah F. Lewis William J. The investigation of dating violence has previously been underrepresented in the interpersonal violence literature. Within the past 2 decades, however, researchers have significantly advanced our knowledge of the variables associated with dating violence. This critical article provides a comprehensive review of the current body of literature on dating aggression.

Research on dating violence is presented, progressing from prevalence rates and types of violence to an exploration of victim and perpetrator characteristics. There is an emphasis on the necessity to establish a theoretical model of typology to allow investigation of the distinct subgroups of violent individuals.

The deficits in the present body of literature are presented and include sampling methods, dependent measures, and data analyses. Finally, implications for future research and prevention are provided. David A. To examine the relationship between child maltreatment, clinically relevant adjustment problems, and dating violence in a community sample of adolescents.

Logistic regression was used to compare maltreated and nonmaltreated youths across outcome domains. Girls with a history of maltreatment had a higher risk of emotional distress compared with girls without such histories e. Boys with histories of maltreatment were 2. Maltreatment is a significant risk factor for adolescent maladjustment and shows a differential pattern for male and female adolescents.

Jul Violence Vict. Daniel O'Leary Jennifer M. The purpose of this study was to identify high school students' actions in response to physical aggression in their dating relationships.

On average, students engaged in two help-seeking actions, with females reporting more actions than males.

Overall, the most common responses to physical aggression in a dating relationship were aggressive action e. Females were more likely to fight back than were males. Race was largely unrelated to students' actions. Intervention opportunities and areas for future research are discussed.

Abused Women or Abused Men? Melanie S Harned. The present study examines the controversial issue of whether women and men are equally abused in dating relationships. To enable a more contextualized understanding of these phenomena, motives for and outcomes of dating violence were also assessed. Hamby, S. A scientific answer to a scientific question the gender debate on intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 2 2— Haynie, D.

Dating violence perpetration and victimization among US adolescents: Prevalence, patterns, and associations with health complaints and substance use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53 2— Heise, L. Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: An analysis of data from population-based surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 3 6e—e Howard, D. Adolescence, 38— PubMed Google Scholar.

Jain, S. Neighborhood predictors of dating violence victimization and perpetration in young adulthood: A multilevel study. American Journal of Public Health, 9— Jezl, D.

Physical, sexual and psychological abuse in high school dating relationships: Prevalence rates and self-esteem issues. Johnson, W. Intimate partner violence and depressive symptoms during adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55 139— Johnson, R. Neighborhood factors and dating violence among youth: A systematic review.

Relationship context and intimate partner violence from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57 6— Jouriles, E. Explicit beliefs about aggression, implicit knowledge structures, and teen dating violence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41 5— Kann, L. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, Kaestle, C. Sexual intercourse precedes partner violence in adolescent romantic relationships.

The Journal of Adolescent Health, 36— Kerr, D. Psychological Medicine, 41 04— Kreiter, S. Gender differences in risk behaviors among adolescents who experience date fighting.

Pediatrics,— Larson, R. The emotions of romantic relationships: Do they wreak havoc on adolescents? Furman, B. Feiring Eds. Latzman, N. Predicting adolescent dating violence perpetration role of exposure to intimate partner violence and parenting practices. Lavoie, F. History of family dysfunction and perpetration of dating violence by adolescent boys: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 30— Lehrer, J. Depressive symptomatology as a predictor of exposure to intimate partner violence among U.

Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine,— Lichter, E. The effects of childhood exposure to marital violence on adolescent gender-role beliefs and dating violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28— Linder, J. Parent and peer predictors of physical aggression and conflict management in romantic relationships in early adulthood.

Journal of Family Psychology, 19 2— Maas, C. Childhood predictors of teen dating violence victimization. Violence and Victims, 25 2— Magdol, L.

Developmental antecedents of partner abuse: A prospective-longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,— Malik, S. Community and dating violence among adolescents: Perpetration and victimization. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 21— Manning, W.

Positive and Negative Outcomes of Sexual Behaviors,53— McCloskey, L. The contribution of marital violence to adolescent aggression across different relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18— Miller, S. Parent and peer predictors of physical dating violence perpetration in early adolescence: Tests of moderation and gender differences. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38 4— Dating violence, bullying, and sexual harassment: Longitudinal profiles and transitions over time.

Millett, L. Child maltreatment victimization and subsequent perpetration of young adult intimate partner violence an exploration of mediating factors. Child Maltreatment, 18 271— Moffitt, T. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 4 Morris, A. From family violence to dating violence: Testing a dual pathway model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44 9— Mueller, V.

Adolescent beliefs about the acceptability of dating violence: Does violent behavior change them? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28 2— Munoz-Rivas, M. Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health consequences.

Aggression in Adolescent Dating Relationships: Prevalence, Justification, and Health Consequences

The Journal of Adolescent Health, 40 4— Murphy, M. Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Maiuro Eds. Nahapetyan, L. Longitudinal association of suicidal ideation and physical dating violence among high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43 4— Niolon, P. Prevalence of teen dating violence and co-occurring risk factors among middle school youth in high-risk urban communities. Journal of Adolescent Health56 2S5—S Nocentini, A.

Amy Buckley: Finding Wholeness in Jesus After Sexual and Domestic Assault [Biola University Chapel]

Physical dating aggression growth during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38 3— Middle school aggression and subsequent intimate partner physical violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25— Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Victims of dating violence among high school students: Are predictors different for males and females? Violence Against Women, 4— A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32— Gender differences in dating aggression among multiethnic high school students.

Journal of Adolescent Health, 42 5— Orpinas, P. Psychological dating violence perpetration and victimization: Trajectories from middle to high school.

Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health consequences.

Aggressive Behavior, 38 6— Trajectories of physical dating violence from middle to high school: Association with relationship quality and acceptability of aggression. Ozer, E. Violence perpetration across peer and partner relationships: Co-occurrence and longitudinal patterns among adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 3464— Poitras, M. A study of the prevalence of sexual coercion in adolescent heterosexual dating relationships in a Quebec sample.

Violence and Victims, 10— Raiford, J. Prevalence, incidence, and predictors of dating violence: A longitudinal study of African American female adolescents. Journal of Womens Health, 16 6— Reyes, H. Adolescent alcohol use and dating violence perpetration: Three studies examining concurrent and longitudinal relations across grades 8 through Sexual dating aggression across grades 8 through Timing and predictors of onset.

The role of heavy alcohol use in the developmental process of desistance in dating aggression during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39 2— Proximal and time-varying effects of cigarette, alcohol, marijuana and other hard drug use on adolescent dating aggression. Journal of Adolescence, 37 3— Gender role attitudes and male adolescent dating violence perpetration: Normative beliefs as moderators.

3 comments Add your comment below

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *